生态语言学批评与《新华字典》里的动物词汇解释  

Ecolinguistic Criticism and the Interpretation of Animal Vocabulary in Xinhua Dictionary

作　　者：赵奎英 Zhao Kuiying

机构地区：[1]南京大学艺术学院

出　　处：《文化研究》2019年第3期265-278,共14页Cultural Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“生态语言学与生态文学、文化理论研究”(1213ZW007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：生态语言学批评与研究具有“超学科”性质,超学科性的核心思想是不同学科的学者与各行从业者合作解决生活世界中的问题,这使得可以把生态语言学批评与各种媒体上出现的关于《新华字典》动物词汇解释的争论结合起来进行讨论。一是从生态语言学批评角度对于这些争论进行再审视,进一步阐释《新华字典》处处从“有用性”、从“吃”的角度解释动物词汇,是否涉嫌动物歧视,一部字典是否具有生命教育的任务和功能。二是通过这一争论进一步反观生态语言学批评,从而更清楚地认识其超学科性质、现实意义和生态伦理学原则等,以促进生态语言学与生态文学、文化批评的跨学科研究和建设。Ecolinguistic criticism and studies possess“transdisciplinarity”.The core idea of transdiscipinarity is different academic disciplines working jointly with practitioners to solve a real-world problem.And this makes it possible to combine ecolinguistic criticism with the debates through various medium about the interpretation of animal words in Xinhua Dictionary.The first is to re-examine these arguments from the perspective of ecolinguistic criticism,whether it is suspected of animal discrimination for Xinhua Dictionary to interpret the animal words always from the view of“eating”“usefulness”,and whether a dictionary has the task and function of life education.The second is to further understand ecolinguisticism s interdisciplinarity,practical significance and principle of ecoethics,so as to promote the interdisciplinary research and construction of ecolinguistics and ecological literary and cultural criticism.

关 键 词：生态语言学批评 《新华字典》 动物词汇 生态伦理学 

分 类 号：H163[语言文字—汉语]