提升学术期刊专家审稿效用的策略  

Strategy for Enhancing Effectiveness of Expert Review of Academic Journals

作　　者：高凌杰 史海英[1] 孙协胜[1] GAO Lingjie;SHI Haiying;SUN Xiesheng(Editorial Office of Journal of Military Transportation University,Tianjin 300161,China)

机构地区：[1]《军事交通学院学报》编辑部,天津300161

出　　处：《天津科技》2020年第8期99-102,共4页Tianjin Science & Technology

摘　　要：双盲审的专家审稿模式下,专家审稿意见能否发挥其应有的作用,与编辑的沟通与总结能力、作者的理解与接受能力息息相关,同时编辑与作者对待专家审稿的态度也在一定程度上影响着专家审稿效用的发挥。为有效提升科技期刊论文质量,提高作者稿件修改效率、最大限度发挥审稿专家的作用,通过分析专家审稿的作用、论文送审需注意问题,针对发表、修改后发表、修改后再审、退稿4种不同审稿结论及不同类型的专家审稿意见,提出相应的处理策略,并概括提出编辑应对专家审稿的原则与方法。Under the double-blind review mode,whether or not expert review opinions can play their due role depends on the ability of editors to communicate and summarize,and the ability of authors to understand and accept.At the same time,the attitude of editors and authors to expert review also affects the effectiveness of expert review to a certain extent.In order to effectively improve the quality of scientific and technological journals,speed up the efficiency of the revision of the author’s manuscripts,maximize the role of experts in reviewing manuscripts,the role of experts in reviewing manuscripts is analyzed.Based on the four different conclusions of publication,modification,reexamination and retraction,and the opinions of different types of experts,corresponding treatment strategies are put forward.The principles and methods of editing the expert review are summarized.

关 键 词：学术期刊 科技论文 专家审稿 期刊编辑 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]