检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:眭正辉 眭昕 束鹏浩 张杰 丁明金[1] SUI Zhenghui;SUI Xin;SHU Penghao(Department of General Surgery,Affiliated Danyang Hospital,Nantong University,Danyang 212300,CHINA)
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属丹阳医院普外科,江苏丹阳212300
出 处:《江苏医药》2020年第7期728-731,共4页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中输尿管导管或T管胆总管引流的临床效果。方法胆囊结石合并胆总管结石老年患者156例,腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中行一期缝合经胆囊管输尿管导管引流64例(细管组),采用T管引流92例(T管组)。比较两组的手术相关资料。结果156例均顺利完成手术,无术中中转开腹。与T管组比较,细管组手术时间[(103.1±27.0)min vs.(120.8±33.1)min]、术后引流管留置时间[(4.3±1.6)d vs.(5.3±2.1)d]和术后住院时间[(6.8±2.0)d vs.(8.4±2.3)d]均较短(P<0.01),住院费用也较少(P<0.01)。两组术中出血量、胆漏发生率和残余结石发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与传统的T管胆总管引流比较,腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术采用一期缝合经胆囊管输尿管导管引流具有较短的手术时间、术后引流管留置时间和术后住院时间的优势,且能减少医疗花费。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ureteral catheter drainage and T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and lithotomy.Methods A total of 156 elderly patients with gallbladder stone and choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and lithotomy,in which the common bile duct drainage was performed with ureteral catheter and primary suture(group A,64 cases)or with conventional T-tube(group B,92 cases).The operation-related data were compared between the two groups.Results The laparoscopic surgery was successful in all 156 cases without one case transfered to laparotomy.Compared to group B,group A had shorter operation time[(103.1±27.0)minutes vs.(120.8±33.1)minutes],drainage tube indwelling time[(4.3±1.6)days vs.(5.3±2.1)days],postoperative hospital stay[(6.8±2.0)days vs.(8.4±2.3)days],and less hespitalization expenses(P<0.01).There were no significant differences in peri-operative blood loss,bile leakage and residual stones between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the conventional T tube drainage of common bile duct,the first-stage suture plus common duct ureter catheter drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and lithotomy has the advantages of shorter operation time,postoperative drainage tube indwelling time and postoperative hospital stay as well as reduced medical costs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40