环境法的定位及其法典化  

Environmental Code: Its Positioning and Codification

作　　者：郑少华[1] 王慧[2,3] ZHENG Shaohua;WANG Hui

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学法学院,上海200443 [2]上海海事大学法学院 [3]上海财经大学,上海201306

出　　处：《学术月刊》2020年第8期129-141,共13页Academic Monthly

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金专项项目(18VSJ040)“改革生态环境监管体制重大法律问题研究”的阶段性成果;台达环境法教育计划基金资助

摘　　要：从历史维度看,环境法从有关环境保护的法迈向专门保护环境的法。在环境法的演进中,环境法因独立性存疑而倍受身份危机的困扰。环境法的危机源于其所调整的生态环境变化无常,这意味着环境法制必须具备较强的适应性:环境保护议程能够根据新的环境科学知识不断及时调整。从有效保护生态环境的角度看,环境法的定位应当从当下的实质法向未来的程序法转变,前者强调"向后看"--总结过去,后者突出"向前看"--面向未来。基于环境法的历史脉络及其合理定位,不难发现环境法法典化绝非易事,理性的环境法法典化应当以程序保障为中心而展开。In the dimension of history,environmental protection law has developed from the laws concerning protecting environment to the special law of environmental protection.In this process,it has been beset by an identity crisis doubting its independence.The crisis originated from the ever-changing ecological environment,of which it tried to control,which means that the law-making must be strongly adjustable,and the process of protecting environment could timely adjusted to the new ecological knowledge.In order to be effective,the positioning of environmental law must be transformed from the present substantive law to the future procedural law.The former emphasizes“looking back”to sum up the past experience,while the latter suggests“looking forward”to face with the future.Based on the historical line and the reasonable positioning of the environmental protection law,it is easy to find that the codification of environmental law is uneasy,and a rational codification should be developed with procedure guarantee as its center.

关 键 词：环境法法典 美国环境法 法律定位 实质法 程序法 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]