论抽象危险犯的谦抑认定——以醉酒型危险驾驶分析为例  

Modest Identification of Abstract Dangerous Crime——Taking Drunk Dangerous Driving as an Example

作　　者：孔祥参 KONG Xiangshen(Faculty of Law, Shenyang Administration School, Shenyang 110036, China)

机构地区：[1]沈阳行政学院法学教研室,辽宁沈阳110036

出　　处：《沈阳大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期406-411,共6页Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(16ZDA061);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L13DFX039)。

摘　　要：以醉酒型危险驾驶罪为切入点,分析了基于风险社会的来临所导致的刑法大量设定抽象危险犯所带来的问题,认为抽象危险犯的泛化背离了刑法谦抑性的基本理念。在对抽象危险犯进行认定时应坚持实质考察的立场,坚持行为属性与结果属性危险的双重判断,适当限制入罪扩张出罪。在对醉酒型危险驾驶罪进行司法认定时,应坚持醉驾危险与公共危险的双重判断,发挥但书的反证机能,确保刑法谦抑性的贯彻。Taking the drunk dangerous driving crime as the starting point,this article analyzes the problems caused by the large number of abstract dangerous crime in criminal law in the risk society,and believes that the generalization of abstract dangerous crime deviates from the basic concept of modesty of criminal law.It believes that when identifying abstract dangerous crime,it should adhere to the position of substantive inspection,adhere to the double judgment of the danger of behavioral attributes and outcome attributes so as to appropriately limit the expansion of crime into crime.When judging the drunk dangerous driving crime,it should insist on the dual judgments of drunk driving danger and public danger,and use the counter-proof function of the proviso to ensure the modest implementation of the criminal law.

关 键 词：风险社会 刑法谦抑性 抽象危险犯 醉酒型危险驾驶罪 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]