检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵源 张国安[1] ZHAO Yuan;ZHANG Guo-an(Law School,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China)
出 处:《体育科学研究》2020年第4期17-23,共7页Sports Science Research
摘 要:体育赛事转播权是体育产业中最具经济价值的一个组成部分,在网络时代下催生出了盗播侵权行为。体育赛事转播权的保护在我国现行著作权法及相关法律体系下无法找寻恰当的法律依据,也不存在与之相关的国际条约规定,致使在实践中常常出现同案不同判的现象。因此,我国有必要借鉴外国法中关于体育赛事转播权的具体规定,以及国际条约中的立法精神,建构并保障体育赛事转播权这一新兴权利。最后,结合体育赛事转播权的法律性质,来分析体育赛事转播权在我国现行法律体系下的两种容纳途径。Sports event broadcasting rights are one of the most economically valuable components of the sports industry,while in the Internet era,piracy and infringement are frequent.Under the current copyright law and related legal system in China,there is no proper legal basis for the protection of sports event broadcasting rights and there is no relevant international treaty,which leads to the confusion of different judgments of the same case in practice.Therefore,it is necessary for China to use the specific provisions on sports event broadcasting rights in foreign laws as reference,and the legislative spirit in international treaties to construct the emerging rights of sports event broadcasting rights.Finally,combining with the legal nature of sports event broadcasting rights,this paper analyzes the two ways to accommodate sports event broadcasting rights under the current legal system in China.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

