三元边际、STRI指数与中国服务贸易开放度检验——兼顾“一带一路”与发达经济体样本数据  

Ternary Margins,STRI Index and China's Service Trade Openness Test--With Countries Engaged in the“Belt and Road Initiative”and Developed Economies as Samples

作　　者：金泽虎[1] 石乐 JIN Zehu;SHI Le(School of Economics,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui,230601)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学经济学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第4期118-132,共15页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(19FGJB005)。

摘　　要：运用18个样本国被分解的服务贸易进出口额数据,度量各国服务贸易在三类边际下的实际开放度;同时在不同行业和政策STRI及服务业FDI限制指数的基础上,比较中国同17个国家服务贸易在政策层面的开放情况。研究发现:中国服务贸易不论是在政策还是在真实开放度上,当前都还处在较低的水平,且真实开放度呈现出以数量边际为主导的特点,这些情况在一定程度上阻碍了中国服务贸易未来的进步。因此需要发挥政府的积极作用,提高服务“产品”的技术水准并鼓励新型服务贸易的发展,加强服务业国际合作与交流,利用对外开放平台助力服务贸易发展。Using the breakdowns of import and export data of service trade in 18 sample countries,we measured the actual openness of service trade in each of the three types of margins.At the same time,based on the STRI and FDI restriction indexes of different industries and policies,a comparison is made on the policy openness of China's service trade with 17 other countries.The study found that while China's service trade is still at a relatively low level in terms of both policy openness and actual openness,the actual openness is dominated by quantitative margins,which has hindered the progress of China's service trade.Therefore,it is necessary for the government to play an active role,by enhancing the technical standard of service trade“product”,developing new types of service trade,strengthening international cooperation and exchanges in the service industry and utilizing open platforms to sustain development.

关 键 词：三元边际 STRI指数 服务贸易开放度 “一带一路” 

分 类 号：F752[经济管理—国际贸易]