检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊领领 田静 XIONG Ling-ling;TIAN Jing
机构地区:[1]河南省黄金资源综合利用重点实验室,河南三门峡472000 [2]河南中原黄金冶炼厂有限责任公司,河南三门峡472000
出 处:《有色冶金节能》2020年第3期16-19,共4页Energy Saving of Nonferrous Metallurgy
摘 要:以某含砷金精矿为实验原料,对比研究了一段焙烧与两段焙烧两种焙烧氧化预处理方式对原料中砷的脱除与有价金属回收效果的影响。实验结果表明:1)两段焙烧的脱砷效果优于一段焙烧;2)对两种焙烧方式获得的焙砂进行酸浸提铜,铜的浸出率均较高,实现了铜的回收;3)酸浸提铜后再进行氰化浸出提金银,两段焙烧的提金效果明显优于一段焙烧,金含量由最初的34 g/t降至4.4 g/t。Taking an arsenic bearing gold concentrate as experimental material,the effects of the pretreatment methods of one-stage roasting and two-stage roasting on arsenic removal and valuable metal recovery were compared.The experimental results had shown that:1)the arsenic removal effect of the two-stage roasting was better than the one-stage roasting;2)the leaching rate of copper from calcine obtained by two roasting methods was high,with realizing the recovery of copper;3)After copper extraction by acid leaching and extraction gold and silver by cyanide leaching,the leaching effect of the gold of two-stage roasting was obviously better than that of one-stage roasting,and the gold content was reduced from the initial 34 g/t to 4.4 g/t.
关 键 词:含砷金精矿 一段焙烧 两段焙烧 酸浸提铜 氰化浸出 回收率
分 类 号:TF83[冶金工程—有色金属冶金] TF802.67
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91