杜甫疏救房琯原因新探  

A new probe into the cause of Du Fu’s rescue of Fang Guan

作　　者：王晓彤 Wang Xiaotong(College of Arts,Xizang Minzu University,Xianyang 712000,China)

机构地区：[1]西藏民族大学文学院,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《六盘水师范学院学报》2020年第4期8-12,共5页Journal of Liupanshui Normal University

基　　金：2018年度西藏自治区哲学社会科学专项资金项目“新出土唐代墓志中涉蕃史料整理与研究”(18AZS001)。

摘　　要：事物的发展不是一成不变的,杜甫的政治见识也是在不断磨砺中成长的,不能因"疏救房琯"一事对杜甫轻下结论。学界对杜甫"疏救房琯"一事有不同声音,但研读历史或可再做进一步分辨。贺兰进明以谗言迷惑圣听,动摇房琯,致使君臣不睦,为肃宗借细罪惩罚房琯做了铺垫。杜甫身在谏臣的位置上,视君所履,查漏补缺,职责所在,本无大错。房琯既有时议,后续罢相事件恶化,影响中兴大业,杜甫本能地为大局发声。"二圣"的政治矛盾端倪渐显,杜甫身为朝臣,在此天下大乱、人心瞬时相悖的时刻救房,不失为一种政治缓和,此举利于战事将成,国家稳定。The development of things is not immutable,and Du Fu’s political insight is growing up in con⁃stant honing,so we can’t make a conclusion to Du Fu because of“Sparing and Saving Fang Guan”.There are different voices in the academic circles about Du Fu’s“Sparing and Saving Fang Guan”,but studying the histo⁃ry can be further distinguished.Helan Jinming misled the saint by slander and shook Fang Guan,which made the emperor and his officials not good,and paved the way for Suzong to punish Fang Guan by means of a fine crime.Du Fu,in his position as a remonstrator,was not in a position to make a big mistake in finding out what was missing and making up what was missing.Fang Guan sometimes argued that the subsequent phase strike worsened and affected ZTE.Du Fu instinctively spoke for the overall situation.The political contradiction of“two saints”is gradually emerging.As a courtier,Du Fu saves his house at a time when there is a great disorder in the world and people’s hearts are in conflict.This is a kind of political relaxation,which is conducive to the war and the stability of the country.

关 键 词：杜甫 贺兰进明 房琯事件 谏臣 中兴大业 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]