“避风港规则”的法律适用困境及消解路径  被引量:18

The Legal Application Dilemmas and Resolution Paths of“Safe Harbor Rule”

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘晋名 艾围利 Liu Jinming;Ai Weili

机构地区:[1]上海大学法学院国际法研究中心,上海200444 [2]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海200234

出  处:《南京社会科学》2020年第8期95-99,116,共6页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

摘  要:随着信息科技的迅猛发展,互联网已渗透到了人们生活的方方面面,网络侵权事件呈现高发态势。我国《民法典》第1195条应用“避风港规则”规制网络侵权行为存在诸多困境,不能从根本上消弭网络侵权问题。应当将“及时”限定在四十八小时以内,构建以注意义务为前提的“避风港规则”适用限制机制,适用过错推定责任原则,合理规制网络服务提供者,达致网络服务提供者与权利人之间的利益衡平。With the rapid development of information technology,the Internet has penetrated into every aspect of people’s lives,and network infringement incidents have shown a high incidence.There are many difficulties in the application of the“safe harbor rule”in Article 1195 of the Civil Code of People’s Republic of China to regulate network tort,which can’t fundamentally eliminate the problem of network tort.We should limit“in time”within 48 hours,build a“Safe Harbor Rule”applicable restriction mechanism based on the duty of care,apply the fault liability principle,and regulate the network service provider reasonably,so as to achieve the balance of interests between the network service provider and the obligee.

关 键 词:避风港规则 “及时” 免责条款 注意义务 过错推定责任 

分 类 号:D923[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象