论信用卡诈骗罪中认识错误的主观归责  

On Subjective Imputation of Cognitive Errors in the Crime of Credit Card Fraud

作　　者：赵春玉[1] Zhao Chunyu

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《政治与法律》2020年第9期58-73,共16页Political Science and Law

摘　　要：信用卡诈骗罪中的选择要素错误是否影响主观归责,取决于不同的选择要素是否具有等价性。具体符合说和法定符合说在选择要素的等价性判断以及选择要素错误的处理上存在不足,并不完全符合我国的立法实际。由于选择要素的等价性是类型化意义上的等价性,因而在信用卡诈骗罪中的选择要素具有同质性的基础上,可以将其类型化为“非法持卡人信用卡诈骗”和“合法持卡人信用卡诈骗”两种类型。在非法持卡人信用卡诈骗的类型之内发生选择要素错误时,信用卡的真假只是判断可谴责性程度的客观资料,其并不影响主观归责;在非法持卡人信用卡诈骗与合法持卡人信用卡诈骗之间发生选择要素错误时,两者在不法上并非互斥关系,而是具有包容性的位阶关系,其主观归责应限制在合法持卡人信用卡诈骗的范围内。Whether the error in selective elements affects the subjective imputation depends on whether there is equivalence between different selective elements.The theory of specific conformity and statutory conformity have flaws in determining the equivalence between selective elements and treating the error in selective elements so they are suitable to China's legislative practice.Because the equivalence between selective elements is determined in terms of typification the crime of credit card may be typified into credit card fraud by an illegal cardholder and credit card fraud by a legal cardholder on basis of the homogeneity of its selective elements.When the error in selective elements is limited to the type of credit card fraud by an illegal cardholder the subjective imputation will not be affected because the authenticity or falseness of credit card is a kind of objective material for determining the degree of condemnability If the error in selective elements occurs between credit card fraud by an illegal cardholder and credit card fraud by a legal cardholder the subjective imputation should be limited to the scope of credit card fraud by a legal cardholder because the two types of credit card fraud are of inclusive hierarchical relationship rather than mutual exclusion in terms of illegality.

关 键 词：信用卡诈骗 选择要素 等价性 主观归责 位阶关系 

分 类 号：DF623[政治法律—刑法学]