赌诈结合情形下的罪名认定规则——以“飞单”购买地下六合彩犯罪为例  

Rules for the Determination of Crimes for Combination of Gambling and Fraud--Take the Purchase of Underground Lottery Ticket in the Way of"Placing Bets First and Later Making Settlement"as Example

作　　者：冯钟鸣 Feng Zhongming

机构地区：[1]湖南文理学院文法学院,湖南常德415000

出　　处：《政治与法律》2020年第9期155-161,共7页Political Science and Law

摘　　要：赌诈结合的犯罪情形在司法实践中比较常见,这两类古老的自然犯随着网络、通讯等新型载体的出现,其结合得更加紧密,呈现复杂样态。实践中司法裁判易混淆犯罪构成中赌博与诈骗的本质差异,呈现出在各种犯罪交织的情况下,只要出现欺诈行为就定诈骗罪的趋势。刑事政策导向上赌诈结合由过去偏向认定为赌博到现在偏向认定为诈骗,混淆了立法论的思考与司法论的思考,出现“重罪化”的趋势。应以刑法教义学方法论为司法适用提供裁判规则,坚持赌诈结合犯罪行为的个别化判断。The combination of gambling and fraud is common in judicial practice.With the emergence of new supporters such as network and communication these two ancient natural crimes are combined more closely and complexly.In practice it is easy to confuse the essential differences of criminal constituent elements between gambling and fraud in judgment showing the trend that if there is a fraudulent act in the combination of various criminal acts the crime of fraud is determined.In the orientation of"criminal policy"the combination of gambling and fraud was shifted from the determination of the crime of gambling in most cases in the past to the determination of the crime of fraud in most cases at present which confuses the thinking of legislative theory with the thinking of judicial theory and shows the trend of"determining more serious crime".For the accurate application of the criminal law it is necessary to stick to the methodology of the dogmatics of criminal law to provide the judgment rules for judicial application and insist on individualized judgement of a criminal act combining gambling and fraud.

关 键 词：赌诈结合 罪名认定 刑法教义学 法律适用 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]