检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张昕[1] Zhang Xin
出 处:《价格理论与实践》2020年第5期17-20,共4页Price:Theory & Practice
基 金:首都经济贸易大学校级科研项目(项目号:2017XJG003):土地出让与城市经济增长关系研究。
摘 要:“免试就近入学”政策催生了学区房,学区房的溢价是优质教育资源的资本化。“多校划片”政策希望通过模糊“学区房”与优质教育资源之间的一一对应关系,增加住宅对应学校的不确定性,降低人们对学区房的追捧,平抑学区房价格。本文利用效用曲线,研究潜在购房者在“多校划片”政策带来的不确定因素下的决策行为。研究表明:在不同潜在购房者的风险偏好倾向假设下,“多校划片”政策给潜在购房者带来的效用期望值不同,对其决策行为影响也有差异。因此,对学区房价格的平抑效果也存在差异。The policy of"free entrance to nearby school"has given birth to school district housing,and the premium of school district housing is the capitalization of high-quality education resources.The policy of"multi-school planning"hopes to increase the uncertainty of the corresponding school of the residence,reduce people's pursuit of the school district housing and stabilize the price of the school district housing through blurring the one-to-one correspondence between the"School District Housing"and the"high-quality education resources".Using the utility curve,this paper studies the decision-making behavior of potential buyers under the uncertain factors brought by the policy of"multi-school planning",and makes an economic analysis of the possible impact of the policy of"multi-school planning"on the school district housing price.The results show that,under the different assumptions of risk preference of potential buyers,the utility expectation values of"multi school planning"policy to potential consumers are different,and the impact on their decision-making behavior is also different,so the stabilizing effect on the school district housing price may also be different.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15