检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张彦平[1] 贺军涛[1] 殷鉴 田莹 姬婧 ZHANG Yanping;HE Juntao;YIN Jian(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710004)
出 处:《陕西医学杂志》2020年第9期1172-1174,共3页Shaanxi Medical Journal
基 金:陕西省社会发展领域项目(2017SF-156)。
摘 要:目的:探讨人体尿液中免疫球蛋白轻链kappa型(U-kap)和lambda型(U-lam)在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者肾损伤中的诊断价值。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,收集系统性红斑狼疮50例作为SLE组。另收集健康体检者20例作为对照组。比较两组尿液中U-kap、U-lam水平,分析U-kap、U-lam在SLE患者肾脏损伤中的诊断价值。结果:SLE组和对照组U-kap、U-lam水平比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,U-kap=6.94 mg/L对肾损伤诊断预测的敏感度为94%,特异度为100%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.951;U-lam=3.81 mg/L对肾损伤诊断预测的敏感度为94%,特异度100%,AUC为0.967。结论:尿液中U-kap、U-lam在SLE患者肾脏损伤中具有良好的临床诊断价值。Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin light chain kappa(U-kap)and lambda(U-lam)in the urine of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE).Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to collect 50 SLE patients as SLE group.Another 20 healthy people were collected as control group.The levels of U-kap and U-lam in urine samples of the two groups were compared,and the diagnostic value of U-kap and U-lam in renal injury of SLE patients was analyzed.Results:There was significant difference between SLE group and control group in the levels of U-kap and U-lam(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the sensitivity,specificity and AUC of U-kap=6.94 mg/L were 94%,100%and 0.951 respectively,and the sensitivity,specificity and AUC of U-lam=3.81 mg/L were 94%,100%and 0.967 respectively.Conclusion:U-kap and U-lam in urine have a good clinical diagnostic value in SLE patients with renal injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49