检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白蒙 周玲 张兰梅 BAI Meng;ZHOU Ling;ZHANG Lanmei(Special Medical Center of Strategic Support Force,Beijing 100101,China)
出 处:《大医生》2020年第5期101-103,共3页Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨米非司酮配伍米索前列醇与利凡诺终止中期妊娠的临床效果及应用价值。方法选取战略支援部队特色医学中心妇产科2018年1月至2019年3月收治的中期妊娠孕妇60例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,每组30例。观察组孕妇采用米非司酮配伍利凡诺,对照组孕妇采用米非司酮配伍米索前列醇。比较两组孕妇的引产结局、围引产指标以及阴道出血量。结果观察组孕妇的完全引产率93.33%,高于对照组73.33%;观察组孕妇的各项围引产指标优于对照组;观察组孕妇引产中出血量、引产后2 h出血量均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论终止中期妊娠时采用米非司酮配伍利凡诺的临床效果优于配伍米索前列醇。Objective To explore the different effects and application value of mifepristone combined with misoprostol and rivanol in termination of mid-term pregnancy.Methods A total of 60 cases of pregnant women with second trimester pregnancy who were treated in obstetrics and Gynecology Department of characteristic medical center of strategic support forces from January 2018 to March 2019 were selected and randomLy divided into observation group and control group,with 30 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with mifepristone combined with rivanol,while the control group was treated with mifepristone and misoprostol.The results of induced labor,the index of induced labor and the amount of vaginal bleeding were compared between the two groups.Results The complete induction rate of the observation group was 93.33%higher than that of the control group 73.33%,(P<0.05);The amount of bleeding in induced labor and 2 hours postpartum in the observation group were less than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Mifepristone combined with rivanol is more effective than misoprostol in the termination of mid-term pregnancy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11