检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟晓妍 项玉平[1] 张春爽[1] ZHONG Xiao-yan;XIANG Yu-ping;ZHANG Chun-shuang(Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University,Liaoning Province,Liaoning Dalian 116000)
机构地区:[1]辽宁省大连大学附属新华医院,辽宁大连116000
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2020年第16期162-163,共2页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:分析CTA和颈动脉超声在动脉粥样硬化诊断方面的应用价值。方法:选择本院2018年2月~2019年2月收治的40例动脉粥样硬化患者为研究对象,所有患者均实施颈动脉超声检查与CT血管造影检查(CTA),比较两种方法诊断结果。结果:评价动脉粥样硬化斑块检出率,CTA与颈部超声差异较小,无统计学意义(P>0.05);评价诊断准确率以及漏诊率,CTA优于颈动脉超声检查,存在统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:CTA和颈动脉超声在动脉粥样硬化筛查方面均有较高的应用价值,相对而言,CTA检查准确率更高,可作为复查方法。Objective:To analyze the application value of CTA and carotid ultrasound in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis.Methods:40 patients with atherosclerosis admitted in our hospital from February 2018 to February 2019 were selected as the research objects.All patients underwent carotid ultrasound examination and CT angiography(CTA),and compared the diagnosis results of the two methods.Results:To evaluate the detection rate of atherosclerotic plaques,the difference between CTA and cervical ultrasound is small and not statistically significant(P>0.05);to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and missed diagnosis rate,CTA is better than carotid ultrasound,with statistics Academic significance,P<0.05.Conclusion:Both CTA and carotid ultrasound have high application value in atherosclerosis screening.Relatively speaking,CTA has a higher accuracy rate and can be used as a review method.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195