检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安婧婧 姜超夫 An Jingjing;Jiang Chaofu
机构地区:[1]山东理工大学法学院 [2]韩国高丽大学法学院
出 处:《山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第5期56-61,共6页Journal of Shandong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家留学基金项目(201408260048);福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目“食品安全大规模侵权的法律救济问题研究”(YYRO1831)。
摘 要:食品安全领域大规模侵权事件已成为国内外关注的热点话题之一,各国对其进行了不同形式的法律救济,并取得一定的成效,例如我国确定了代表人诉讼制度、美国确立了集团诉讼制度、德国采取了民法典的模范程序、日本确立了选定当事人制度等。随着对食品安全领域大规模侵权研究的不断深入,我国对其监管力度正逐步加强,但是相关制度并不是非常完善,尤其是对受害者的权利救济手段不能很好地维护其权益。因此,为了更好地解决我国食品安全领域大规模侵权法律救济问题,必须基于我国国情有选择地借鉴其他国家的经验,建立我国食品领域大规模侵权法律救济的多元化综合治理机制。The mass tort in the field of food safety has become a hot topic at home and abroad.Different countries have made different attempts to provide legal relief for it and some achievements have been achieved,such as the establishment of representative litigation system in China,the establishment of class action system in the United States,the adoption of civil code procedures in Germany,and the establishment of the system of selected parties in Japan.As the research on the mass torts in the food safety field deepens each day,more supervision has been imposed on this field,but the available remedial measures in China are not efficient for compensating the massive victims whose right to safe food is harmed in food scandals.Therefore,in order to better avoid the mass torts of food safety in China,we must select the sound relief methods from other countries,taking China’s national conditions into consideration.It is beneficial to establish a diversified and comprehensive governance mechanism for mass torts in the field of food safety in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117