木材和人造板硬度测定试验方法及标准研究  被引量:2

Study on Hardness Test Methods and Standards of Wood and Wood-based Panels

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:虞华强[1] 安鑫[1] 赵有科[1] 李晓玲[1] YU Hua-qiang;AN Xin;ZHAO You-ke;LI Xiao-ling(Research Institute of Wood Industry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China)

机构地区:[1]中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所,北京100091

出  处:《木材工业》2020年第5期40-43,共4页China Wood Industry

基  金:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金“《木材物理力学性质试验方法》国家标准修订研究”(CAFYBB2018MB001)。

摘  要:为了探讨GB/T 1941—2009《木材硬度试验方法》的修订依据,分析布氏(Brinell)硬度、金氏(Janka)硬度、硬度模量方法、表面硬度、Monnin硬度等试验方法的优缺点,并比较国内外木材硬度试验方法标准。其中金氏硬度方法以其方法简单、准确、高效,为ISO和各国广泛应用。针对GB/T 1941—2009的修订,建议增加生材硬度测试方法,同时为人造板(厚度>3 mm)和易裂木材补充硬度模量测试方法。In order to provide evidences for revising the national standard of GB/T 1941—2009 Method of testing in hardness of wood,the authors analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of various wood hardness test methods such as the Brinell hardness method,the Janka hardness method,the hardness modulus method,surface hardness method,and the Monnin hardness method,etc.The standards on test methods of wood hardness in China and abroad were compared.Among these test methods,Janka hardness is the most widely adopted by ISO and many countries because it is very simple,accurate and efficient.GB/T 1941—2009 does not specify a hardness test method for green wood,therefore it is recommended to add in.The hardness modulus test method is proposed for the purpose of measuring the wood-based panel with a thickness greater than 3 mm and wood susceptible to crack.

关 键 词:木材 人造板 硬度 标准 试验方法 含水率 

分 类 号:S781.2[农业科学—木材科学与技术] TS67[农业科学—林学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象