码头打入桩沉桩施工中欧规范比较  

Comparison between Chinese and European code for driven pile construction of wharf structure

作　　者：娄学谦[1] 桑登峰[1] 兰金平 胡兴昊[1] 陈明杰[1] 王幸 LOU Xue-qian;SANG Deng-feng;LAN Jin-ping;HU Xing-hao;CHEN Ming-jie;WANG Xing(CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510230,China;The Third Engineering Company of CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Zhanjiang 524009,China)

机构地区：[1]中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广东广州510230 [2]中交四航局第三工程有限公司,广东湛江524009

出　　处：《水运工程》2020年第9期85-90,157,共7页Port & Waterway Engineering

基　　金：广州市珠江科技新星专项资助项目(201806010164);广州市珠江科技新星专项资助项目(201906010023)。

摘　　要：近年来,我国的施工企业在"一带一路"沿线国家承揽了较多码头工程,但因对国外规范了解不深入,给施工开展带来很大困扰。以中国码头施工规范和欧洲挤土桩规范EN 12699为例,比较中国和欧洲两套现行规范在码头打入桩沉桩施工中部分条款之差异,主要结果有:1)欧洲规范原则性条文更多,中国规范则有比较细致的定量指标;2)中国规范很多内容在欧洲规范中属于应由设计方考虑的内容;3)欧洲规范对打桩监控、试验、记录有系统的规定,而中国规范仅突出记录。比较结果对于我国施工企业开展国外码头建设有所裨益。Chinese construction enterprises have undertaken many wharf projects along "the Belt and Road"countries in recent years. However,the lack of in-depth understanding of foreign codes brings great trouble for the construction. Taking the construction code for wharf structures of China and the execution code for displacement piles of Europe as an example,we compare the differences between the two codes. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) there are more principles in European code,while there are more detailed quantitative indicators in Chinese code;2) many contents in the Chinese specification shall be considered by the designer in the European specification;3) the European code has systematic rules on piling monitoring,testing and recording,while the Chinese code only highlights records. It is beneficial to Chinese construction enterprises to carry out foreign wharf projects.

关 键 词：打入桩施工 中国码头规范 欧洲规范 比较 

分 类 号：TU473[建筑科学—结构工程] U65[建筑科学—土工工程]