刑法文本中的“公共财产”与“公共财物”研究  

Research on“Public Possession”and“Public Property”in Criminal Law Text

作　　者：王琦 Wang Qi(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2020年第4期43-49,共7页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

基　　金：司法部重点课题“内在性视域下法治乡村的建设路径研究”(19SFB1002)。

摘　　要：我国刑法文本中同时存在着“公共财产”“公共财物”这一对相似的概念,导致人们对这两个概念难以形成清晰和统一的认知,进而影响刑事司法实践中对贪污罪条文“公共财物”这一概念的准确理解和适用。单从概念上进行分析,“公共财物”和“公共财产”的内涵都具有公共性,唯一不同在于外延是否包括财产性利益。但从法律方法视角进行分析,对于“公共财物”这一概念应当作出扩大解释,包括货币、物品和财产性利益在内。在刑事司法实践中,司法工作人员通过宪法解释、法律解释、指导案例、裁判说理等法律方法分析路径,可以有效消解这一对相似概念所导致的司法适用困境,更准确地处理贪污贿赂犯罪案件,落实反腐败工作,实现司法公正目标。At the same time,there are similar concepts of“public possession”and“public property”in the text of criminal law in China,which makes it difficult for people to form a clear and unified understanding of these two concepts,and then affects the accurate understanding and application of the concept of“public property”in criminal justice practice.From the concept of analysis alone,“public possession”and“public property”connotation are public,the only difference lies in whether the extension includes property interests.However,from the perspective of legal methods,the concept of“public possession”should be interpreted in an expanded way,including currency,goods and property interests.In the practice of criminal justice,judicial staff can effectively solve the judicial application dilemma caused by similar concepts by analyzing the path through legal methods such as constitutional interpretation,legal interpretation,guidance case and adjudication,deal with the cases of corruption and bribery more accurately,carry out anti-corruption work and achieve the goal of judicial justice.

关 键 词：公共财产 公共财物 宪法解释 法律解释 指导案例 裁判说理 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]