检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程宝良[1] Cheng Baoliang
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学国际商学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2020年第15期132-135,共4页Frontiers
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“马克思制度正义思想及其对当前社会公正建设的价值研究”成果,项目编号:12XKS020。
摘 要:新、旧福利主义的学术演化导致福利主义出现效率与公平、序数主义与福利主义不能兼容的难题,留给学术界众多启示和教训。排斥伦理评价导致福利主义丧失学术定位和理论价值,脱离经济现实导致福利主义失去发展方向和机遇,选择序数主义分析技术导致福利主义理论终结。社会福利变化是一动态过程,基于福利主义学术演化的经验,动态福利主义的提出丰富了福利主义的理论,一定程度上突破了福利主义理论发展的瓶颈,对评价和优化社会福利有积极意义。The academic evolution of the new and old welfarism has resulted in the conflict between efficiency and fairness and between ordinalism and welfarism,which provides a lot of insights and lessons to the academia.The rejection of ethical evaluation leads to the loss of academic orientation and theoretical value of welfarism,its separation from economic reality causes the loss of development direction and opportunity,and choosing the ordinal analysis technology has the welfare theory terminated.The change of social welfare is a dynamic process.Based on the experience of the academic evolution of welfarism,the dynamic welfarism enriches the theory of welfarism,breaks through its development bottleneck to a certain extent,and has positive significance for evaluating and optimizing social welfare.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15