公安机关刑事技术工作的两种模式及改革完善  

Two Modes of Criminal Technical Work in Public Security Organs and Their Reform and Improvement

作　　者：刘娜 LIU Na(Graduate School, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学研究生院,北京100038

出　　处：《皖西学院学报》2020年第4期70-75,共6页Journal of West Anhui University

基　　金：2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CFX044);中国人民公安大学2020年拔尖创新人才培养经费支持项目(2020ssky002)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：中国刑事技术工作形态可概括划分为“侦查技术”模式及“鉴识技术”模式。侦查技术模式典型代表为县区级刑事技术工作模式,该模式下刑事技术人员不仅要对证据材料进行鉴定,往往还需依据现场、物证来亲身参与案件侦办,对案件破获和作案人认定承担责任;鉴识技术模式典型代表为部省市级刑事技术工作模式,该模式下刑事技术人员很少承担案件侦办职责,以接受下级办案单位鉴定委托为核心业务。通过考察两种模式的运作机制、模式成因及具体特征,细化分析当前各级刑事技术人员承担鉴定任务时所面临的具体情况,对公安机关刑事技术工作进行改革完善。The working form of criminal technology in China can be divided into“investigation technology”mode and“identification technology”mode.The typical representative of the investigation technology mode is the county and district level criminal technology work mode.Under this mode,the criminal technical personnel not only need to identify the evidence materials,but also need to participate in the case investigation personally according to the scene and physical evidence,and bear the responsibility for the case detection and the identification of the perpetrators.The typical representative of the identification technology mode is the provincial and municipal level criminal technology work mode,and the core business of the criminal technical personnel under this mode is to accept the appraisal and entrustment of the lower handling units.By analyzing the operation mechanism,causes and specific characteristics of the two modes,this paper makes a detailed investigation of the specific situation faced by the current criminal technical personnel at all levels when they undertake the identification task,and further reforms and perfects the criminal technical work of the public security organs.

关 键 词：刑事技术 司法鉴定 刑事鉴定 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]