清代民国时期学者对《直隶河渠书》案的参与——兼论《直隶河渠书》案与《水经注》案之关系  

The Participation of Scholars in the Qing Dynasty in the Case of ZHILIHEQUSHU——a Discussion about Relationship between the Case of ZHILIHEQUSHU and the Case of SHUIJINGZHU

作　　者：宋开金 刘森文[2] SONG Kai-jin;LIU Sen-wen(College of Marxism,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学马克思主义学院,山东青岛266590 [2]山东大学出版社,山东济南250100

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期6-12,共7页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(17CZS002):戴震藏《直隶河渠书》稿研究。

摘　　要：嘉庆年间引发的《水经注》案引起之后学界的广泛关注与参与,而与之关系密切的《直隶河渠书》案则很少受到瞩目。两桩公案的发起者均为段玉裁,而《水经注》案的主要参与者魏源、张穆、孟森、王国维、梁启超、胡适等,均参与到《直隶河渠书》案中,实际上为《水经注》案开辟了新的“战场”。当然,《直隶河渠书》案并不仅仅是《水经注》案的“附庸”,它引发的学术话题亦足以自成体系,如《直隶河渠书》稿本的整理与研究,《畿辅安澜志》与《直隶河渠书》的关系问题等,都值得作进一步研究。Since the reign of Jiaqing of Qing Dynasty,the case of SHUIJINGZHU has attracted extensive attention in academic circles,while the case of ZHILIHEQUSHU,which is closely related to the former one,has barely attracted attention.The initiators of the two cases were Duan Yucai,while the main participants in the case of ZHILIHEQUSHU included Wei Yuan,Zhang Mu,Meng Sen,Wang Guowei,Liang Qichao,Hu Shi,etc.They all participated in the case of ZHILIHEQUSHU which actually opened up a new“battlefield”for the debate on the case of SHUIJINGZHU.The case of ZHILIHEQUSHU is certainly not only a“supplement”of the case of SHUIJINGZHU,but also causes enough academic topics to form its own system,such as the arrangement and research of the ZHILIHEQUSHU and the relationship between JIFUANLANZHI and ZHILIHEQUSHU are worth further research.

关 键 词：清代民国 《水经注》案 《直隶河渠书》 《畿辅安澜志》 关系 

分 类 号：K250[历史地理—历史学]