检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:聂晨[1] NIE Chen(School of Public Administration,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China)
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学公共管理学院,北京100191
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第5期80-90,共11页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:北京社科基金青年项目(17GLC038);教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金。
摘 要:中东欧国家在转型过程中分别移植了西欧的剩余化住房模式和一般化住房模式。然而,经过近30年的变迁过程,政策的空间位移并没有让中东欧转型国家的住房体系建立类似西欧的稳定住房市场,也没有实现多样化的范式转型,反而出现了不同程度的房价波动、金融支持缺乏、购房困难加剧以及居住质量恶化四个方面的失灵问题。本文通过运用转型国家住房体系的评价体系,在比较视野下分析了中东欧转型国家住房政策移植失灵的表现,并结合政策移植和失灵模型的最新进展,从福利供给网络组成的政府、市场和家庭三个层面分析了失灵的原因,最后提出中国如何有效借鉴其中的经验和启示。In the process of transition,Central and Eastern European countries transplanted the surplus housing model and the general housing model of Western Europe respectively.However,after nearly 30 years of change,the spatial displacement of policies has not allowed the housing systems of the countries in transition in Central and Eastern Europe to establish a stable housing market similar to that in Western Europe,nor has it achieved a diversified paradigm transformation.Instead,there have been varying degrees of passive housing prices,the lack of financial support,the intensification of housing purchases and the deterioration of the quality of living.This article analyzes the performance of housing policy transplantation failures in the transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe by using the evaluation system of the housing system of transition countries,and combines the latest developments in policy transplantation and failure models,analyzes the causes of the failure on three aspects,including governments,markets and households composed of welfare supply networks,and finally puts forward what China can learn from their experience and enlightenment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28