检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高杨[1,2] 席晓旭[1] 李梦露 邢宁[1] 程流泉[1] GAO Yang;XI Xiaoxu;LI Menglu;Xing Ning;CHENG Liuquan(Radiology,First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Radiology,Nanhua University Affiliated Changsha Hospital,Changsha 410005,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院第一医学中心,北京100853 [2]南华大学附属长沙中心医院,长沙410005
出 处:《磁共振成像》2020年第9期752-757,共6页Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
摘 要:目的数字化乳腺X线摄影(digital X-ray mammography,DMG)判读的个体差异较大,对一些病灶的判读缺乏病理实证措施。该研究以MRI为参照,通过前瞻性和回顾性的DMG阅片对比分析,比较DMG与MRI对乳腺病变检出及分类定性的一致性。材料与方法收集316例接受乳腺MRI和DMG检查的病例,以DMG独立的BI-RADS分类作为DMG的前瞻性诊断(the prospective BI-RADS categorization of DMG,pDMG),以受MRI辅助的BI-RADS分类作为回顾性诊断(the retrospective BI-RADS categorization of DMG,rDMG),比较前瞻性和回顾性DMG判读的一致性和与MRI的差别。结果pDMG和rDMG对病灶的BI-RADS分类(Ⅱ~Ⅳ)的一致性为69.66%(163/234),Spearman相关系数r=0.813,P<0.05;pDMG和MRI对病灶Ⅱ~Ⅴ分类评价的一致性为36.41%(79/217),Spearman相关系数r=0.435,P<0.05。rDMG和MRI对病灶Ⅱ~Ⅴ分类评价的一致性为44.22%(134/303),Spearman相关系数r=0.546,P<0.05;以MRI报告的病灶数量为参照,pDMG的检出率66.42%(269/405),rDMG检出率74.81%(303/405)。DMG表现为钙化、肿块、不对称密度的病灶与MRI的肿块、非肿块强化和BPE等不构成对应关系。结论DMG判读具有较大的个体间差异,MRI和DMG在病灶的检出数量和分类诊断都缺乏很好的一致性,其影像表现也缺乏一一对应的关系。Objective:Digital X-ray mammography(DMG)interpretation shows reader’s discrepancy and lacks pathological confirmation for some cases.In this study,we used MRI as a reference to investigate DMG in detection and categorization of breast lesions in a prospective and retrospective readings.Materials and Methods:A total of 316 patients underwent breast MRI and DMG were enrolled in this study.The prospective BI-RADS categorization of DMG(pDMG)was independent of MRI,while the retrospective BI-RADS categorization of DMG(rDMG)was MRI-assisted.The detection and categorization between DMG and MRI were compared.Results:The consistency between pDMG and rDMG in BI-RADS categoryⅡ—Ⅳwas 69.66%(163/234),where Spearman r=0.813 and P<0.05.Their consistency between pDMG and MRI in BI-RADS categoryⅡ—Ⅴwas 36.41%(79/217),where Spearman r=0.435 and P<0.05.The consistency between rDMG and MRI in BI-RADS categoryⅡ—Ⅴwas 44.22%(134/303),where Spearman r=0.546,P<0.05.Using MRI as reference,the DMG had a detection rate of 66.42%(269/405)prospectively and 74.81%(303/405)retrospectively.The imaging findings of calcification,mass and asymmetric density on DMG were not consistent with the mass,non-mass-enhancement or background parenchymal enhancement on MRI.Conclusions:DMG is reader dependent in the lesions detection and categorization.MRI and DMG lack a satisfactory consistency in the lesions detection and BI-RADS categorization.Their imaging findings also lack any sort of one-to-one correspondence.
关 键 词:乳腺疾病 乳房X线摄影术 磁共振成像 病例对照研究
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.9[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222