改编权与复制权侵权判定方法之厘革——以两权的“交叠”关系为视角  

The Reform of the Judgment Method for the Infringement of the Right of Adaptation and the Right of Reproduction--From the Perspective of the"Overlapping"Relationship of the Two Rights

作　　者：高婧 Gao Jing

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2020年第3期92-99,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：改编权从复制权中分离,既有客观外部力量的推动,也是符合自身内在合理性的演变。两权利存在交叠,绝不是非此即彼的关系。为此,有必要对实务中改编权与复制权二选一的侵权认定之误读加以澄清。针对二者的区分问题细化“实质性相似”判定标准,充分认识“抽象相似”和“整体性相似”分别在改编权和复制权侵权认定中的重要作用。构建改编权与复制权侵权判定语境下的“三步观察法”,为司法实践提供明确且具操作性的指引。The separation of the right of adaptation from the right of reproduction is not only the promotion of objective external forces in history,but also the evolution of its own internal logic.The overlapping of the two rights is by no means an either/or relationship.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the misinterpretation of the right of adaptation and the right of reproduction in practice.In view of the distinction between the two,the criterion of"substantive similarity"is refined,and the important roles of"abstract similarity"and"overall similarity"in the determination of the infringement of the right of adaptation and the right of reproduction are fully understood.In order to provide clear and operational guidance for judicial practice,the"three-step observation method"in the context of the judgment of adaptation right and reproduction right infringement should be constructed.

关 键 词：复制权 改编权 实质性相似 抽象相似 三步观察法 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]