检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙浩林 杨礼庆[1] 钱鹍鹏 李岩[1] Sun Haolin;Yang Liqing;Qian Kunpeng;Li Yan(The First Orthopaedic Department,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University1,Liaoning Shenyang 110000;The Second Orthopaedic Department,the Central Hospital of Tieling City2,Liaoning Tieling 112000)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学盛京医院骨一科,辽宁沈阳110000 [2]铁岭市中心医院骨二科,辽宁铁岭112000
出 处:《中国社区医师》2020年第26期62-63,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:分析平卧位与侧卧位下PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆骨折的临床效果。方法:2017年1月-2019年1月收治股骨粗隆间骨折患者84例,随机分为两组,各42例。两组均行PFNA内固定治疗,对照组采用平卧位,试验组采用侧卧位。比较两组临床疗效。结果:试验组体位摆放时间、切口长度、手术出血量及手术时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折时,选择侧卧位比平卧位疗效显著,可缩短体位摆放时间及手术时间,且术中出血量少,切口长度短。Objective:To explore the curative effect of PFNA internal fixation in supine position and lateral position in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur.Methods:From January 2017 to January 2019,84 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur were selected and randomly divided into two groups of 42 cases in each.Two groups were treated with PFNA internal fixation,the control group used supine position,the experimental group used lateral position.We compared the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results:In the experimental group,the placement time,incision length,bleeding volume and operation time were lower than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur with PFNA internal fixation,the effect of lateral position is better than that of supine position,which can shorten the time of body position and operation,and the amount of bleeding is small and the length of incision is short.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3