检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施洁琼 SHI Jieqiong(School of Marxism, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学马克思主义学院,上海201620
出 处:《镇江高专学报》2020年第3期46-49,54,共5页Journal of Zhenjiang College
摘 要:死刑存废问题深受伦理学所关注。基于应然视角探讨,死刑报应论和威慑论存在一定的伦理缺陷,且死刑违背现代人权理念,应当废除死刑。基于实然视角考察,采用渐进式,将生命权载入宪法,引导公民理性认识死刑,设立死刑废除后的替代刑罚,为废除死刑奠定基础。The problem of death penalty retention or abolition is an issue deeply concerned by ethics.Based on the perspective of“ought-to-be”,there are some ethical defects in the theory of retribution and deterrence of death penalty,and the death penalty violates the modern concept of human rights.So the death penalty should be abolished.Based on the perspective of reality,this thesis introduces the right to life into the constitution gradually,guides the citizens to understand the death penalty rationally,and constructs the alternative penalty after the death penalty is abolished so as to lay the foundation for the abolition of the death penalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.87.126