检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王媛[1] 郑春梅 郭晓燕 WANG Yuan;ZHENG Chun-mei;GUO Xiao-yan(Department of Stomatology,Beijing Aerospace General Hospital,Beijing 100076,China)
出 处:《中国当代医药》2020年第25期228-230,234,共4页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨综合护理干预措施在糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者口腔治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2018年5月~2019年5月我院口腔科收治的100例糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者作为研究对象,采用随机抽签法分为对照组(n=50)与研究组(n=50)。对照组采用常规护理,研究组采用综合护理干预措施。比较两组护理前后的牙菌斑指数、出血指数及心理状态评分,比较两组的临床护理依从性,比较两组临床护理满意度。结果两组护理前牙菌斑指数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组护理后牙菌斑指数低于本组护理前,研究组护理后牙菌斑指数低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组护理前出血指数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组护理后出血指数低于本组护理前,研究组护理后出血指数低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组护理前的焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组护理后SAS、SDS评分低于本组护理前,研究组护理后SAS、SDS评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组临床护理总依从性高于对照组,研究组临床护理总满意度高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者口腔治疗中开展综合护理干预措施的效果确切。Objective To explore the application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in oral treatment of diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods A total of 100 patients with diabetes with chronic periodontitis treated in our hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were selected as the subjects of the study,and divided into the control group(n=50)and study group(n=50)by the random drawing method.The control group adopts routine nursing,and the study group adopts comprehensive nursing intervention measures.The dental plaque index,bleeding index and psychological status score of the two groups before and after nursing were compared,the clinical nursing compliance of the two groups was compared,and the clinical nursing satisfaction of the two groups was compared.Results There was no significant difference in dental plaque index between the two groups(P>0.05);the dental plaque index of the two groups after nursing was lower than that before nursing,the dental plaque index of the study group was lower than that of the control group after nursing,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in bleeding index between the two groups before nursing(P>0.05);the bleeding index of two groups after nursing was lower than that before nursing,the bleeding index of the study group after nursing was lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the scores of self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)between the two groups before nursing(P>0.05);the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups after nursing were lower than those before nursing,the SAS and SDS scores of the study group after nursing were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The clinical nursing total compliance rate after nursing in the study group was higher than that of the control group,the clinical nursing total satisfaction of the patients in the study gr
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117