司法裁判视角下让与担保的认定——兼论《九民纪要》第71条  

Judgment of Assignment Guarantee from the Perspective of Judicial Adjudication--Also on Article 71 of Minutes of Meeting

作　　者：殷雄 Yin Xiong(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200063)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200063

出　　处：《宁波广播电视大学学报》2020年第3期54-59,共6页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University

基　　金：最高人民法院司法研究重大课题(ZGFYZDKT201808-05);华东政法大学硕士研究生学术研究及社会调研项目专项资金项目(2019-4-173)研究成果。

摘　　要：让与担保是实践中形成的一种非典型担保类型,债务人或第三人为担保债务的履行,将担保标的转移给他人,于债务不履行时,该他人可就担保标的受偿.司法实践中关于让与担保的性质和效力认定争议不断,为统一裁判尺度,《九民纪要》正式明确了让与担保的相关效力问题.本文在对让与担保理论争议和司法裁判态度进行梳理的基础上,对《九民纪要》让与担保规定作出具体评析,并提出三方面建议:明晰让与担保法律定位、优化让与担保公示手段、拓宽让与担保实现方式。Assignment guarantee is an atypical type of guarantee formed in practice.The debtor or a third party transfers the subject of the guarantee to another person for the performance of the guaranteed debt.When the debt is not performed,the other person can be compensated for the subject of the guarantee.Injudicial practice,disputes over the nature and effectiveness of concession guarantees continue to be determined.In order to unify the standard of judgement,the Civil Code and the Nine Minutes have formally clarified the relevant validity issues of concession guarantees.On the basis of sorting out the controversy over concession guarantee theory and the attitude of judicial judgment,this article makes a specific analysis of the concession guarantee provisions of the Minutes of Meeting,and puts forward three suggestions:clarify the legal position of concession guarantee,optimize the publicity of concession guarantee Means,broaden the way of realizing concessions and guarantees.

关 键 词：让与担保 效力认定 流质契约 公示清算 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]