违约方解除合同的路径选择与裁判应对  

Path Choice and Judicial Response of Defaulting Party’s Contract Termination

作　　者：杨在会 冯婉淇 YANG Zaihui;FENG Wanqi(Civil and Commercial Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2020年第8期31-39,共9页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：西南政法大学2019年度民商法学院学生科研创新项目(MS-BS2019002)。

摘　　要：“效率违约理论”在追求效率的同时并不违反诚实信用或公平等道德原则,需结合各国相关理论和实践为其正名,证成违约方特定情形解除合同的正当性。在违约方解除合同的路径选择上,无论选择何种路径,在司法审判中都应衡酌案件类型及违约方是否蓄意违约,合同继续履行的可能性及经济上的合理性,损害赔偿的程度等,结合个案情况与社会利益保护作综合判断。The“theory of efficient breach of contract”that does not violate the moral principles of honesty,credit or fairness while pursuing efficiency,which needs to be justified in combination with the relevant theories and practices of various countries to confirm the legitimacy of the defaulting party terminating contract under special circumstances.In terms of the choice of the path for the defaulting party to terminate the contract,no matter what path it takes,in the judicial trial,it is necessary to make a comprehensive judgment on the type of case and whether the defaulting party intentionally breaching the contract,the possibility and economic rationality of the continued performance of the contract,the degree of compensation for damages,etc.,in combination with the case situation and the protection of social interests.

关 键 词：违约方解除合同 法定解除权 司法解除权 履行费用过高 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]