庭审实质化语境下法官预判的认知偏差及其防控  

The Cognitive Bias of Judge’s Prejudgment in the Context of Substantive Trial and and Its Prevention and Control

作　　者：魏丹丹 韩振文 Wei Dandan;Han Zhenwen

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学法学院 [2]山东理工大学元华庭审研究中心 [3]浙江工商大学法学院 [4]浙江大学

出　　处：《法治社会》2020年第5期74-82,共9页Law-Based Society

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“庭审实质化语境下法官认知风格的测验及其改善研究”(项目编号:18CFX004)的研究成果。

摘　　要：法官预判在一定程度上满足民众对于纠纷解决的公正期待。法官在经过长期对案件审理的过程中,很容易形成思维定势,依靠直觉、法感等对待决案件作出预测评判。直觉和态度等不稳定的非理性因素导致法官预判可能出现认知偏差。法官在当前制度制约下,运用预判对案件先定后审,可能出现庭审虚化现象。故要防范控制法官预判的认知偏差,需要法官自身予以理性反思以及外部制度的监督纠正。The judge’s prejudgment meets the public’s fair expectations for dispute resolution to some extent.In the process of hearing the case for a long period,it is easy for a judge to form a set of thinking and rely on intuition and legal sense to make prediction and judgment.Unstable irrational factors such as intuition and attitude may lead to cognitive bias in the judge’s prejudgment.Under the restriction of the current system,judges use prejudgment to decide the case before trial,which may lead to the virtual phenomenon of trial.Therefore,in order to prevent and control the cognitive bias of the judge’s prejudgment,the judge needs to make a rational reflection and the external systems need to give proper supervision and correction.

关 键 词：法官预判 认知偏差 防控修正 庭审实质化 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]