检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马得懿[1] 周明园 MA De-y i;ZHUO Ming-yuan(International Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law(ECUPL),Shanghai 200050,China)
出 处:《河北法学》2020年第9期55-65,共11页Hebei Law Science
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目《军民融合战略下海上通道安全法治保障研究》(18ZDA155);中国海洋发展研究会重点项目《海洋综合性立法关键问题研究》(CAMAZD201902)。
摘 要:海上执法中船舶操控方式的合法性之判定,受制于国际法与国内法的界定。南海仲裁案第13项仲裁请求涉及到中国在黄岩岛海域的海上执法中的船舶操控方式问题,对这一行为的准确定性是判断该行为是否合法的前提。仲裁庭将1982年《联合国海洋法公约》第94条适用于领海,以在本项仲裁请求中并入1972年《国际海上避碰规则》的规定,严重违背了条约解释的原则。针对海上执法中的船舶操控方式,在1982年《联合国海洋法公约》与1972年《国际海上避碰规则》存在条约冲突的情况下,根据条约本身的冲突条款以及特别法优先原则,前者应该优先予以适用。在中国执法船的海上执法权利与菲律宾违法船舶的航行权利发生冲突的情况下,司法实践应该根据法律的价值顺位进行权利位阶上的考量,优先保障海上执法这一维护国家主权的基本权利。The judgement of the legality of ship operation in maritime law enforcement is restricted by international law and domestic law.The Submission No.13 of South China Sea Arbitration involves ship operations in China’s maritime law enforcement in the waters of Huangyan Island.The accurate nature of the operation is the premise for judging whether the operation is legal.The arbitral tribunal applied Article 94 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS)to the territorial sea in order to incorporate the provisions of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea(COLREGS)in the Submission No.13,which is a serious violation of the principles of treaty interpretation.About the ship operations in maritime law enforcement,in the case of treaty conflict between UNCLOS and COLREGS,the former should be taken precedence according to the conflict provisions of the treaty itself and the principle of priority of special law.In the case of conflicts between the maritime law enforcement rights of Chinese law enforcement vessels and the navigation rights of Philippine illegal vessels,judicial practice should consider the hierarchy of rights according to the value hierarchy of laws,give priority to guaranteeing the maritime law enforcement which is the basic right to safeguard national sovereignty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200