小贺科水电站布置方案比选  

Comparison and Selection of Layout Scheme of Xiaoheke Hydropower Station

作　　者：辛道涛 程昌勇 赵景志 XIN Daotao;CHENG Changyong;ZHAO Jingzhi(Technical Advisory Center of Pearl River Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources,Guangzhou 510611,China)

机构地区：[1]水利部珠江水利委员会技术咨询中心,广东广州510611

出　　处：《广东水利水电》2020年第9期14-17,43,共5页Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower

摘　　要：根据河流总体规划,结合小贺科水电站规划河段的地形地质条件,初拟2个坝址5种布置方案,从梯级衔接、淹没补偿、施工条件、工程投资、工程效益等多方面进行综合比较。选择梯级衔接好、电站装机大、发电量多、单位千瓦投资和单位电度投资小的隧洞引水方案为电站推荐方案。According to the General River Planning and combined with the topographic and geological conditions of the planned dam section of Xiaoheke Hydropower Station,the five layout schemes of the initial two dam sites are compared comprehensively from many aspects such as cascade connection,inundation compensation,construction conditions,project investment and project benefit.The tunnel water diversion scheme with good cascade connection,large power plant installed,large power output,small per kilowatt investment and per unit power investment is recommended for the power station。

关 键 词：电站布置 方案比选 小贺科水电站 

分 类 号：TV731[水利工程—水利水电工程]