栾调甫与民国学术史上的“墨辩”讨论  

Luan Diaofu and the Study of Moist Debate in Chinese Modern Academic History

作　　者：朱斌 ZHU Bin(School of Marxism,Qufu Normal University,Qufu 273165,China)

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学马克思主义学院,山东曲阜273165

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2020年第5期42-51,共10页Qilu Journal

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究一般项目“齐鲁大学国学所研究”(19CLSJ08);山东省高校人文社会科学研究计划项目“‘贯通学思两途’:栾调甫与民国学术史上的‘墨子辨’运动”(J18RA264)。

摘　　要：栾调甫是中国现代学术史上一位特殊的学者,一生以国学研究为志业,在墨学、名学、文字学及贾(思勰)学等领域皆有建树。他虽自学成才,却能与梁启超、章太炎、胡适等大家论学交往,并“预流”现代墨学研究的大潮。他在矫正主流墨学研究之偏的基础上,提出“坚白离盈二宗”说,为“墨辩”研究开出新境界,深受学界推重。栾调甫墨学研究成果及其治学方法是中国现代学术史上不应遗落的一页。Luan Diaofu was a special scholar in Chinese modern academic history.He regarded sinological research as his life’s work,and he had made great achievements in many fields including Mohism,the study Name,Philology study and Jia Sixie study.He became talented through self-study,but he can discuss academic problems with great masters,such as Liang Qichao,Zhang Taiyan and Hu Shi,and predicted the study trend of Mohism.On the basis of revising the bias of mainstream study of Mo school,he proposed the theory that“two parts:separate-combination and hard-white”and created a new approach for the study of Moist debate.Through the study of his academic achievements and research method,we can understand the page which cannot be ignored in Chinese modern academic history.

关 键 词：栾调甫 国学研究 墨子辨 坚白离盈二宗 齐鲁文化 

分 类 号：K203[历史地理—历史学]