检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Kai Ruffing
出 处:《Journal of Ancient Civilizations》2020年第1期95-131,134,共38页世界古典文明史杂志(英文版)
摘 要:In current research on the economy of the Hellenistic and Roman worlds it is taken for granted to use papyri as evidence for ancient economic structures,practices,and mentalities.Nevertheless,the utility of papyri is all but selfevident,at least as far as research of the 20th century is concerned.Egypt including its source material was considered a special,particular case and thought to be entirely useless for writing economic history of Greece and Rome.This was especially true for primitivist orthodoxy.Moreover,it was particularly German scholarship that showed some neglect towards economic history and thus papyri.Against the background of the general discussion on the character of ancient economy the present paper aims to trace how and to what extent papyri were and are used as evidence.It starts with the outbreak of the Biicher-Meyer controversy and tries to pursue the discussion to the present day.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239