行政机关协助司法的行为性质及其可诉性研究  

A Study on the Nature of Administrative Organ’s Assistance to Judicature and its Litigability

作　　者：胡建淼 刘威 HU Jianmiao;LIU Wei(Parly School of the Central Committee of C.P.C,National Academy of Governance,Beijing 100091,China)

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政治和法律教研部,北京100091

出　　处：《法学论坛》2020年第5期46-60,共15页Legal Forum

摘　　要：司法机关在调查事实或者执行司法裁判过程中有时需要行政机关的协助,否则无法独自完成司法任务。行政机关对司法的协助行为,应当如何定性并如何适用法律,成了公法学特别是行政法理论和实践中的一大难题。以对中国现行制度规范和司法实践的考察为基础,梳理该类协助行为在定性上的理论观点,分析其理论、制度和实践中定性逻辑的困境,提出以"行为主体+法律适用"作为定性标准,将该类协助行为原则上界定为行政行为,从而推翻了理论上将其一概定性为"司法行为"的传统习惯,纠正制度规范和司法实践中以"权力延伸论"或"合法论"对其进行定性的逻辑错误。在此基础上,也对该类协助行为如何寻求行政诉讼救济的程序特点进行了探索。Judicial organs sometimes need the assistance of administrative organs in the process of fact-finding or judicial execution,otherwise they cannot complete their judicial tasks alone. How to determine the nature and how to apply the law to the judicial assistance of administrative organs has become a big problem in public law,especially in the theory and practice of administrative law. In this paper,based on China’s current regulations and judicial practice,combing the class helping behavior on the qualitative theory,analyzes the qualitative logic theory,system and practice,put forward " behavior main body + applicable law" as the qualitative standard,defines the class help behavior in principle as administrative action,to overthrow the theory its altogether as the tradition of " judicial behavior",corrected the regulations and judicial practice in the theory of " power" or " legal theory" to qualitative logic errors. On this basis,it also explores the procedural characteristics of how to seek administrative litigation relief.

关 键 词：行政机关 协助 司法 行为 性质 诉讼 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]