陈翰笙与国立中央研究院无锡农村经济调查  

Chen Han-seng and Wuxi Agrarian Studies at the Academia Sinica

作　　者：范世涛[1] Fan Shitao

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学经济与资源研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《中国经济史研究》2020年第5期165-192,共28页Researches in Chinese Economic History

基　　金：国务院发展研究中心《薛暮桥年谱》项目成果之一。

摘　　要：陈翰笙领导的国立中央研究院无锡农村经济调查在学界享有盛誉,但也歧说纷纭,扑朔迷离。本文综合使用国立中央研究院官方出版物、哥伦比亚大学珍本图书馆特藏太平洋国际学会档案以及陈翰笙、王寅生未刊稿,对陈翰笙主持无锡农村经济调查的过程、理论准备和研究成果进行整理和报告。本文认为,无锡调查源于陈翰笙与马季亚尔1928年在莫斯科的辩论;除了1929年调查,陈翰笙领导的团队还分别于1931年和1932—1933年进行了两次补充调查,后一次调查催生了中国农村经济研究会(1933—1951年)。调查数据整理过程中,陈翰笙以隐蔽的方式主持了密集的理论研究,除了《资本论》第3卷,马季亚尔、列宁和考茨基是主要的理论资源。本文还修正了无锡农村经济调查报告只有一份且已失传的通行看法,指出无锡调查产生一系列原创成果,其中两份无锡地权报告主要内容包括在陈翰笙和邱茉莉以太平洋国际学会书记处名义编选、翻译的英文本《农村中国》(Agrarian China)一书中。陈翰笙以理论结合实际的经验调查方法回应重大问题,与同期莫斯科趋于教条化的马克思主义经济研究形成范式分流,进而导致中国农村经济研究的中心从莫斯科转移到上海。不仅如此,薛暮桥、孙冶方、钱俊瑞等当事人在参加陈翰笙主持的农村经济研究过程中建立起理论联系实际的能力,这种能力直到改革开放年代仍在发挥作用。Despite favorable historical research,there are differing opinions about the Wuxi agrarian economy field research conducted by the Academia Sinica under the leadership of Professor Chen Han-seng.This article reconstructs the historical significance of Chen's Wuxi studies using official publications of the Academia Sinica,Columbia's Rare Book and Manuscript Library,and unpublished manuscripts by Chen Han-seng and Wang Yinsheng.It finds that the Wuxi investigations originated from the 1928 Moscow debates between Chen Han-seng and Hungarian revolutionary economist Lajos Magyar.In addition to the well-known field study in 1929,Chen's team conducted separate supplementary investigations in both 1931 and 1932-33,the latter of which gave birth to the Agrarian China Research Association(1933-51).While compiling the survey data,Chen Han-seng presided over extensive theoretical studies about the works of Lajos Magyar,Vladimir I.Lenin,Karl Kautsky,and Karl Marx.This article challenges the popular narrative that there was only one Wuxi research report,which was lost after completion.Instead,Chen's team produced an entire series of original articles and books.There are two Wuxi land ownership reports in Agrarian China,compiled and translated by Chen Han-seng and Elsie Fairfax Cholmeley and produced under the name of the Research Staff of the Secretariat of the Institute of Pacific Relations.Chen Hanseng responded to major questions by conducting empirical research linked to Marxist economic theory,and he formed a Marxist paradigm that diverged from Moscow's dogmatic tendencies during the same period.This resulted in a shift in the locus of agrarian China research from Moscow to Shanghai.Furthermore,Xue Muqiao,Sun Yefang,and Qian Junrui established their ability to integrate theory with practice during the field research process under Chen's direction.This ability remained critical until the era of reform and opening up.

关 键 词：陈翰笙 马季亚尔 无锡农村 亚细亚生产方式 范式分流 

分 类 号：F32[经济管理—产业经济]