检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜惠 景晓平[1] DU Hui;JING Xiaoping(School of Foreign Studies,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China)
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学外国语学院,江苏南京210094
出 处:《厦门理工学院学报》2020年第4期77-83,共7页Journal of Xiamen University of Technology
基 金:教育部规划基金科研项目(19YJA740024)。
摘 要:基于语用身份论与标记模式理论,对“人民日报”“南京发布”“头条新闻”和“老年之声AM1053”4类微博用户发布的新闻叙事中,老年指称语的变异现象及其身份建构情况的研究发现:就使用频率而言,有标记性指称语多于无标记性指称语;从具体分布来看,类指指称最多,其次是亲属指称、姓名指称等。除使用无标记性指称“姓名”建构老人的确定性个体身份之外,微博新闻还使用大量的有标记性指称语来建构老人的群体身份和关系身份;有标记性指称语和无标记性指称语之间的连续变异展现出老年人身份的动态建构,即个体身份内部的互动,个体身份向关系身份、个体身份向群体身份的转变等。Based on Pragmatic Identity theory and the Markedness Model,reference variability and identity construction of the elderly in the news narration published by four Microblog users(People's Daily,Nanjing Post,Headline News,Voice of the Elderly)are exploredData analysis shows that there are more marked references than unmarked ones,among which generic references are the most frequently used type,followed by kinship references and namesResults indicate that a large number of marked referential expressions are adopted to construct group identity and relational identity of the elderly,in addition to the definite personal identity constructed by namesMoreover,the continuous variation between marked and unmarked references reveals the dynamic identity construction of the elderly,that is,the internal transformation of personal identity,the transformation from personal identity to relational identity,and the transformation from personal identity to group identity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.230.80