检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄玉睿 宾建成[2] 方慧[1] HUANG Yurui;BIN Jiancheng;FANG Hui(School of International Trade and Economics,Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Jinan,Shandong 250001,China;School of International Trade and Economics,Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Songjiang District,Shanghai 201620,China)
机构地区:[1]山东财经大学国际经贸学院,山东济南250001 [2]上海对外经贸大学国际经贸学院,上海松江区201620
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2020年第5期119-125,共7页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(18FGJ013);国家自然科学基金项目(U1706211)。
摘 要:根据国际贸易全成本理论,基于扩展的引力模型,选取2006-2017年世界银行营商环境报告数据,评估美国、日本、韩国及欧盟25国跨境费用维度的贸易便利化对中国农产品出口的影响。结果表明:理论上,进口国跨境费用的减少对中国农产品出口具有一定的促进作用,但实际上被农产品技术性贸易措施所产生的抑制作用弱化,最终导致进口国跨境费用视角的贸易便利化水平提高不但没有促进中国农产品出口,反而产生了一定的抑制作用。According to the total cost theory of international trade,based on the extended gravity model,using the data of the World Bank Doing Business report 2006-2017,this paper evaluates the impact of trade facilitation in the cross-border expense dimension of the United States,Japan,South Korea and the EU 28 countries on China's agricultural exports.The results show that:in theory the reduction of the cross-border expenses of the importing countries can promote the export of China's agricultural products to a certain extent,but in fact,it is weakened by the inhibitive effect of technical trade measures of agricultural products;and ultimately leads to that,the improvement of the level of trade facilitation from the perspective of the cross-border expenses of the importing countries does not promote the export of China's agricultural products,but has a certain inhibitive effect on the export of China's agricultural products.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3