全球性抑或属地性:被遗忘权的空间范围争议与执行方案选择  

Global or Territorial:the Spatial Controversy of the Right to Be Forgotten

作　　者：邹举[1] 叶济舟 Zou Ju;Ye Jizhou

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学新闻与传播学院 [2]澳门大学社会科学学院传播系

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2020年第8期75-93,127,128,共21页Journalism & Communication

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“全球互联网治理背景下主权原则的理论调适与实践路径研究”(项目编号:18BXW115)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：欧盟自推出被遗忘权以来,在管辖范围、义务主体、权利客体等关键因素上进行了扩张性解释,试图将信息删除的范围推广至全球。事实上,除部分欧盟国家倾向于将该权利视为一项全球性权利,很多国家更偏向于对其空间范围作出多元化解释,这让全球性被遗忘权的设想遭遇到挑战。管辖国应以"利益平衡"为基本原则,对全球遗忘的"效果"进行适当限制,处理好本国与他国利益的关系。在具体执行上,应以主权的国际礼让为先,以"地理封锁"方案为惯例,可以考虑全球删除的例外情况,但是需要明确这种例外情况的测试标准。同时,应尽快将该问题纳入互联网治理的框架之中,以提高司法管辖区之间的协调性。Since the introduction of the right to be forgotten,the European Union(EU)has expanded its interpretation on key factors such as jurisdiction,subject of obligation,and object of right,trying to extend the scope of information deletion to the world.In fact,with the exception of some EU countries that tend to view the right as a global right,many countries are more inclined to give diverse interpretations of their spatial scope,which challenge the idea of a global right to be forgotten.Jurisdictional countries should use"balance of interests"as the basic principle to properly limit the"effects"of being globally forgotten,and to handle the relationship of interests between their own country and other countries.In terms of implementation,the international courtesy of sovereignty should be prioritized,and geo-location blocking should be used as a convention.Exceptions of global deletion can be considered,but the test criteria for such exceptions need to be clarified.At the same time,the issue should be included in the framework of internet governance as soon as possible to improve coordination among jurisdictions.

关 键 词：被遗忘权 空间范围 争议 执行方案 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]