“作品类型法定原则”批判  

Criticism of the Principle of“Copyright Law’s Exhaustive List of Works”

作　　者：卢海君[1] Lu Haijun

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《社会科学》2020年第9期95-103,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

摘　　要：“作品类型法定原则”认为,不属于著作权法法定类型的表现形式不应受著作权法保护。该原则颠倒了作为第一性存在的作品与作为第二性存在的著作权法之间的关系,违背了创作规律,误读了公约及相关立法例对作品的定义及示例规范,不利于文化产业发展和著作权法立法宗旨的实现,属于典型的著作权法家长主义。未来著作权法应以更为明确的方式建立开放式的作品类型示例模式。The principle of“Copyright Law’s Exhaustive List of Works”believes that expressions that are not legal types of the copyright law should not be protected by the copyright law.This principle violates the law of creation,misreads the definitions and examples of works in the Convention and relevant legislation,which is not conducive to the promotion of the development of the cultural industry and the realization of the legislative purpose of the copyright law.This principle is typical of legal paternalism.In the future,the copyright law should establish an open example model of work types in a more clear way.

关 键 词：作品定义 作品类型化 作品类型法定 法律家长主义 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]