检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐传钧 QI Chuan-jun
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院社会发展战略研究院 [2]中国社会科学院社会保障实验室
出 处:《保险研究》2020年第8期103-115,共13页Insurance Studies
摘 要:在人口老龄化压力下,很多国家被迫降低公共养老金待遇并同时引入自愿性个人养老金来填补待遇缺口。这种做法不仅在理论上获得支持,而且正在成为一种通用做法并被广泛认同。但本文通过对美国和德国的实践考察,发现自愿性个人养老金难以承担这种"替代"功能,究其原因可以从三个方面进行解释。因此,不同国家要对自愿性个人养老金做出政策定位,在推动其正常发展的同时也要对现有养老金改革方向进行系统性反思。Under the pressure of aging population,many countries are forced to reduce public pension benefits and introduce voluntary personal pension to fill the gap.This is not only supported in theory,but also has become a common practice and been widely accepted.However,through the study on the practices of the United States and Germany,it is found that it is difficult for voluntary personal pension to undertake this"alternative"function,and the reasons can be explained from three aspects.Therefore,different countries should make their own policy orientation for voluntary personal pension,and at the same time,they should make rethinking on the current direction of pension reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.200.110