再造秩序:“元治理”视角下城市住宅小区的多元治理之道  

Recreating Order:The Way of Multiple Governance in Urban Residential Districts from the Perspective of“Meta Governance”

作　　者：田先红 张庆贺 Tian Xianhong;Zhang Qinghe

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学中国农村研究院,政治科学高等研究院,湖北武汉430079 [2]重庆大学法学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2020年第10期94-106,共13页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：“研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神”国家社会科学基金重大项目“健全充满活力的基层群众自治制度研究”(项目编号:20ZDA029)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在城市住宅小区中,由政府、市场、社会等不同主体协商互动形成的多元治理模式时常陷入治理失灵的困境。住宅小区治理失灵主要由治理主体缺位、治理主体关系失衡所致。在“元治理”理论视角下,克服治理失灵需要在治理中“找回国家”,发挥国家和政府在治理中的主导地位。政府“元治理”的角色主要体现在两个方面:一是“政府补位”,政府通过再造治理主体,重构多元共治体系;二是“政府协调”,政府设立职能机构专门负责住宅小区治理,以构建多元主体协商平台,协调治理主体关系。这两方面的本质都是强化政府在住宅小区治理中的主导地位,发挥政府“对治理进行治理”的“元治理”功能,从而确保住宅小区建立有序高效的多元共治模式。The governance failures of residential quarters are mainly caused by the absence of governance entities and the imbalance between governance entities.From the perspective of meta-governance theory,overcoming governance failures requires“recovering the country”in governance and giving play to the dominant position of the country and government in governance.The role of government meta-governance is mainly reflected in two aspects:one is“government fills up”,the government rebuilds the governance body to reconstruct the multiple co-governance system;the other is“government coordination”,the government set up a functional organization to be responsible for the governance of residential quarters to build a platform for multi-subject negotiation and coordinate the relationship between governance subjects.

关 键 词：治理失灵 元治理 多元共治 政府补位 政府协调 

分 类 号：C912.81[经济管理]