检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶庆东[1,2] 何兆益[1] 贾颖[1,3] TAO Qing-dong;HE Zhao-yi;JIA Ying(School of Civil Engineering,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China;Department of Architectural Engineering,Mianyang Polytechnic,Mianyang 621000,China;Guizhou Transportation Planning Survey&Design Academe Co.,Ltd.,Guiyang 550000,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆交通大学土木工程学院,重庆400074 [2]绵阳职业技术学院建筑工程系,绵阳621000 [3]贵州省交通勘察规划设计研究院股份有限公司,贵阳550000
出 处:《科学技术与工程》2020年第23期9551-9560,共10页Science Technology and Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51278513);四川省教育厅项目(18ZB0307,16ZB0462);贵州省交通厅项目(201412102601)。
摘 要:为探明上埋式涵洞侧填土荷载对地基承载力的影响,基于普朗特尔-赖斯纳与太沙基极限承载力理论,研究了涵洞基础深度效应与宽度效应下涵洞基底粉质黏土、黏性土与砂土地基承载力变化规律与曲线特征。此外,基于涵洞地基的实际受力情况与涵洞地基承载力计算图示,修正了太沙基地基承载力计算方法,并将用修正方法计算得到的涵底地基承载力结果与数值模拟计算结果、太沙基方法计算结果进行了对比分析。结果表明:(1)涵洞基础深度效应与宽度效应对高填方涵洞地基承载力的提高作用明显,随着基础埋深系数的增加,粉质黏土、黏性土与砂土的地基承载力值随之增加,粉质黏土与黏性土地基增加的幅度较小,砂土地基增加的幅度较为显著;(2)当基础宽度系数k≥5时,黏土与砂土地基承载力增长幅度减小,而粉质黏土地基承载力增长幅度较大;(3)填土高度为6 m时,改进方法计算得到的地基承载力值比有限元法大8.78%,比太沙基计算公式法大18.72%,改进方法比太沙基方法更接近涵洞地基极限承载力值。In order to explore the influence of side filling load of upper-buried culvert on the foundation bearing capacity, the variation law and curve characteristics of silty clay, clay and sand foundation bearing capacity under depth and width effects of culvert foundation were studied, based on the ultimate bearing capacity theory of Prandtl-Reissner and Terzaghi. In addition, based on the actual stress situation of culvert foundation, the calculation diagram and improved calculation method of culvert foundation bearing capacity were proposed. At the same time, the improved method calculation results of culvert foundation bearing capacity were compared with the numerical simulation results and the calculation results of Terzaghi method. The results show that the depth effect and width effect of culvert foundation can improve the bearing capacity of high fill culvert foundation obviously. With the increase of foundation buried depth coefficient, the bearing capacity of silty clay, cohesive soil and sandy soil will increase. However, the increase of silty clay and cohesive soil will be smaller, and the increase of sandy soil will be more significant. When the foundation width coefficient k is larger than or equal to 5, the increase rate of foundation bearing capacity of clay and sand will decrease, and the increase rate of foundation bearing capacity of silty clay is larger. When the filling height is 6 m, the bearing capacity of the improved method is 8.78% higher than that of the finite element method, and 18.72% higher than that of the Terzaghi method. The improved method is closer to the ultimate bearing capacity of the culvert foundation than that of the Terzaghi method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.129.249