香港立法会调查权的法律界限——政治制度的视角  

The Legal Limits of Investigation Power of Hong Kong Legislative Council

作　　者：叶海波[1] Ye Haibo(Law School,Shenzhen University$Shenzhen 518060)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学港澳基本法研究中心、法学院,深圳518060

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2020年第10期67-75,158,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目《香港“客卿”司法的实证研究》;深圳大学高水平大学学科建设(二期)项目“跨境经营中的合规管理”(项目号0000011301)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：香港特区建立了以行政长官为核心的行政主导制,在这一体制下,行政机关与立法机关相互制约相互配合,且重在配合,司法机关独立审判。权力分置和行政主导是确定香港立法会调查权法律界限的基本维度。香港立法会在行使《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法》(以下简称香港基本法)第73条授予的职权时,可以启动调查程序,传召证人作证并提供证据,但香港立法会调查权的行使必须符合目的性原则和"合理需要"原则,并受到行政特权和司法特权的限制。另外,香港立法会若以监督香港政府为目的传召政府官员作证并提供证据,其调查事项应仅限于第64条列举的范围,且须通过"安全"或"重大公共利益"标准的检验。这是香港行政主导制对立法会调查权的特别限制。The political structure of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is one which is composed of guiding administration units,independent judiciary,with control and balance of administration and legislation.The base and core of political structure are separation of power and executive-led,which definite critically the legal limits of investigation power of the Legislative Council.When exercising the powers and functions in accordance with the article 73,the Legislative Council can summon persons concerned to testify or give evidence,and in accordance with the article 48(11),article 64,article 73(10)and article 85 of The Basic Law of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,executive privilege and judiciary privilege are the limits of investigation power of Legislative Council,and Legislative Council should implement investigation in accordance with principle of aim-led and reasonably required.To make the Government to account to Legislative Council,Legislative Council can summon government officials concerned to testify or give evidence,but the power of Legislative Council is limited in the conditions of article 64 and the investigation should pass the"security and vital public interests"test.

关 键 词：立法会 调查权 行政特权 司法特权 行政主导 

分 类 号：D921.9[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]