检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐银娜 赵国浩[1] XU Yin-na;ZHAO Guo-hao(School of Business and Administration,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China)
机构地区:[1]山西财经大学工商管理学院,山西太原030006
出 处:《统计学报》2020年第5期13-24,共12页Journal of Statistics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71774105);山西省软科学项目(2019041012-1,2018041066-4)。
摘 要:工业企业生产系统、创新系统与生态系统耦合协调发展是企业高质量发展的内在要求。本文在用SBM-DEA和Malmquist指数对工业企业生产效率、创新效率和生态效率进行测算和纵向分析的基础上,引入了耦合协调度模型,对三系统间的耦合协调度进行了测算,并分析了其时空演化过程。结果表明:十年来我国工业企业生产效率、创新效率和生态效率整体上均呈上升态势,但三个效率发展不平衡;三系统间的耦合协调度水平虽呈增长态势,但与高级协调的耦合协调水平仍有很大差距;三系统间的耦合协调度空间格局呈现出东部先行再向中部、西部逐渐渗透的特征,全局空间自相关呈现出显著正相关关系,空间集聚效应显著。The coupling coordinated development of production system,innovation system and ecology system in industrial enterprises is the inherent requirement of enterprises'high-quality development.Based on the measurement and vertical analysis of the three systems with the methods of SBM-DEA and Malmquist index,this paper introduced the coupling coordination degree model to measure the coupling coordination degree among the three systems,also to analyze its spatiotemporal evolution processes.The results showed that,in the past ten years,the three systems of the industrial enterprises in China showed an upward trend,but they developed unevenly.And the level of coupling coordination degree still lagged behind advanced level a lot.The spatial pattern of coupling coordination degree among the three systems presented the characteristic of the eastern region first and followed by the central and western regions.And the overall spatial autocorrelation showed a significant positive correlation,as well as evident spatial agglomeration effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30