检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐清[1] 赵广超[1] 栾建凤[1] 严京梅 QI Qing;ZHAO Guang-chao;LUAN Jian-feng;YAN Jing-mei(Jinling Hospital Department Blood Transfusion,Nanjing University,School Medicine,Nanjing 210002,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军东部战区总医院(原南京军区南京总医院)输血科,南京210002
出 处:《当代护士(下旬刊)》2020年第10期5-7,共3页Modern Nurse
基 金:全军重大课题(ANJ13J001)支持。
摘 要:目的研究优质护理服务对无偿献血的干预作用。方法采用系统抽样的方法随机选取本血液中心2018年1月—2018年12月的12,562名献血者进行分组研究。其中外出团体采血的为对照组,共9,726人,采用常规护理;在本血液中心采血的为观察组,共2,836人,采用优质护理服务。比较两组不良反应发生率、非标量报废率和满意度。结果对照组献血不良反应发生率(1.58%)高于观察组(0.78%),对照组献血非标量报废率(1.26%)高于观察组(0.50%),护理满意度(86.3%)低于观察组(99.4%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施优质护理可有效预防献血不良反应,提高献血者服务满意度和献血积极性,有利于献血事业的发展。Objective Analysis of the effect of high quality nursing intervention on blood donation.Methods Randomly selected 12,562 blood donors from January 2018 to December 2018,among which 9,726 who donated outside the blood center were collected as the control group,and 2,836 who donated in blood center were collected as the observation group.Take general nursing for control group,and high quality nursing for observation group.The rates of adverse reaction,scrap and satisfaction index of two groups were compared.Results The incidence of adverse reactions(1.58%)in the control group was higher than that in the observation group(0.78%),the scrap rate(1.26%)in the control group was higher than that in the observation group(0.50%),and the nursing satisfaction(86.3%)was lower than that in the observation group(99.4%).Conclusion High quality nursing may effectively prevent adverse reactions,improve blood donors'service satisfaction and enthusiasm for blood donation,which is conducive to the development of blood donation cause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28