史料作为问题——以木斧为中心的考察  

Historical Materials as a Problem:A Case Study of Mufu

作　　者：海晓红 HAI Xiao-hong(Journal Editorial Department,North Minzu University,Yinchuan 750021,China)

机构地区：[1]北方民族大学学报编辑部,宁夏银川750021

出　　处：《北方民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期138-144,共7页Journal of North Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“当代回族文学史料整理与研究”(17XZW043)。

摘　　要：木斧文学史料大致包括笔名史料、书信史料和诗文评论史料,整理研究这三类史料发现,作家身份认知变化与作品主旨之间的关系,"文白之争"与作家创作,蜜蜂社、《路和碑》与木斧的关系等是木斧研究中的疏漏。究其缘由,史料意识的匮乏引致搜集、整理资料不够完善是关键,应当引起研究者的重视。Mufu literature historical materials roughly include pen name historical materials,letters to historical and poetry comment historical materials,finishing of this three types of historical materials found,writer identity cognitive change and works keynote the relationship between“classical and colloquial”battle and writer writing,“Bee society”,relationship between Road and Monument and Mufu are in the omissions.Investigate the reason,lack of historical materials awareness resulted in collecting,and documenting,which should be noticed by researchers.

关 键 词：木斧 文学史料 甄别 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]