知识产权国际条约在我国法院的适用  

On the Application of IP International Treaties by Chinese Courts

作　　者：杨珮茹 Yang Peiru

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2020年第9期72-83,共12页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：基于知识产权保护的地域性和独立性原则,在涉外知识产权案件中,知识产权国际条约并不当然具有优先适用的效力。在理论上,知识产权国际条约的生效方式、效力层级和可援引性问题都会直接影响知识产权国际条约在国内法院的适用。实践中,涉外知识产权案件适用国际条约的情形主要有直接适用、与国内法并列适用以及援引条约以解释国内法或直接援引条约的原则。我国应根据条约适用的理论,区分知识产权国际条约的属性,以高标准保护知识产权的结果为导向,选择适用保护标准高于国内法的国际条约。Guided by the principle of territoriality and the independence of intellectual property rights,international IP treaties are not always naturally applied in domestic judicial practice.Theoretically,the application of international IP treaties in domestic courts are significantly influenced by the way in which the treaties take effect,the legal hierarchy of the treaties comparing to domestic laws,and the extent to which the treaties can be cited.In Chinese judicial practices,the international IP treaties can be applied to foreign-related IP cases in the following ways,namely,direct application,juxtaposing domestic laws and international IP treaties,citing treaties to explain domestic laws,or citing treaties directly.Based on treaty application theories,the paper suggests developing a result-oriented approach and,considering the attribute of certain IP treaties,apply the treaties that provide higher standards of protection comparing to domestic law.

关 键 词：知识产权国际条约 TRIPS协定 保护工业产权巴黎公约 保护文学和艺术作品伯尔尼公约 准据法 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]